Hi Les,
On 10/8/15, 8:51 PM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Pushpasis - > >Not all conflicts are intra-area - so your response does not cover all cases. [Pushpasis] I did not get the above statement. But essentially I meant that in a given area if the same index is originated (and not re-advertise/re-originated), the ABRs in that node should not propagate the prefix-sid-tlvs for that prefix to other area.. > >In addition, your proposal introduces some new problem areas. Do we leak the >prefix but remove the conflicting SID info or stop leaking the prefix entirely? [Pushpasis] Prefix should still be re-advertised, but without the prefix-sid-subtlv. So you stop the SR-reachability without affecting the native IP-reachability. Thanks -Pushpasis > >If you think about these issues I believe the advantage of Stefano's proposal >becomes clear. > > Les _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
