Hi Les, all

As an individual contributor, as expressed at the mic during the meeting, this 
work is really needed and thank you for doing it.
I have 2 main comments on the draft:
a) IMHO, the draft should better evaluate and take into account the (possible) 
consequences on the network / customers' traffic.
b) at this point in the discussion (-00), I think the draft should present the 
available options with their pro & con in a neutral way.

I feel that these 2 points are important for the discussion in the WG, as the 
subject is not trivial and will require trade-off. Hence I'd like to have the 
draft updated before WG adoption.

Thanks,
Regards,
Bruno

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to