Support the WG adoption as co-author, not aware of any IPR
On 7/25/16, 1:35 AM, "spring on behalf of Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >As co-author, I support the adoption of this document to WG item. > >I¹m not aware of any IPR that hasn¹t been disclosed already. > >s. > > >> On Jul 24, 2016, at 2:55 PM, John G. Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear WG, >> >> As we discussed at our meeting, working group adoption has been >>requested for draft-filsfils-spring-large-scale-interconnect. Please >>reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to >>whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially >>encouraged to comment. >> >> We will end the call on August 31, 2015. >> >> Authors, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and >>if so, whether it has been disclosed. Also, the length of the author >>list for this document greatly exceeds the maximum recommended. Assuming >>the document is adopted, the authors should be prepared to correct this >>when submitting as a WG document, ideally by reducing the list to simply >>the active editor(s) and making use of the "contributors" section for >>the full list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Bruno and John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > >_______________________________________________ >spring mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
