Hi Martin, I think this draft should be made Proposed Standard.
Regards, Ruediger -------------------------------------- From: Martin Vigoureux <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] WG LC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing Date: December 6, 2016 at 2:34:14 PM GMT+1 To: <[email protected]> WG, this is a reminder, please express your opinion regarding this WG LC. Thank you -m >> Hello WG, >> >> this e-mail initiates a two-week WG LC for >> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing [1]. >> >> All authors have already replied to the IPR poll. >> There is known IPR [2] on this document. >> >> Please read the latest version of the document and state whether or >> not you support the submission of this document to the IESG as a >> Proposed Standard. >> >> Please also express the comments you would have on this latest version. >> >> Your involvement in this step is very important so please take the >> time to read and express your opinions on the list. >> >> Thank you >> >> M&B >> >> [1] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing/ >> [2] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-s >> pring-segment-routing >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
