Support this draft.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 16 February 2017 05:05
To: i...@ietf.org
Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aret...@cisco.com>; spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on 
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on 
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There are 
two implementations describe on the wiki at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20

The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus 
Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.   The 
authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information :


1)     Were these implementations separate implementations?

2)     What were the results of the interoperability tests?

This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work 
in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider:

1)     Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/

2)     Is this technically ready for publication?

3)     Does it fit with the spring informational draft?

For the ease of reference the web references are below:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/

Sue Hares
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to