Hi Experts, Can someone reply please.
Rgds, Kaliyaperumal K On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:51 AM, tech_kals Kals <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Experts, > > Could you please explain me what would be the expected behavior in the > following scenario in *Quarantine approach*. > > Mapping entries *E1, E2, E3 *are Active entries. > > In case, if incoming new entry say *X *which has conflict with *E1, E2 > and E3.* > > Assume, *X is better than E1 but not better than E2. ( E1 < X < E2)* > > * 1] X is better than E1 so E1 will become excluded entry and X will > become an active entry* > > * 2] Now, X is compared with E2. E2 is better than X. So, X will become > excluded entry and E2 is an active entry as it was.* > > *So, X and E1 will become "excluded entry".* > > *I couldn't find any info as shown above in the RFC. Can you please > clarify ?* > > > *My doubts:* > *1) Will the entry become active only if it wins with all entries which > are conflicted with this ?* > *2) When doing conflict resolution with other entries, it can win with > some entries and can lose to some? What could be the behavior ? * > * - This is the case which I explained above.* > * - In this case, X can become active by winning to E1 and lose E2 > which leads X and E1 to become inactive/excluded entry.* > > > can you please clarify ? > > > Regards, > __tech.kals__ >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
