+1 Support the publication of this draft.
Regards, Gaurav On 7/10/17, 7:12 AM, "spring on behalf of stefano previdi" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I strongly support the publication of this draft. I’m not aware of any IPR related to the mechanisms described in the draft. s. > On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Martin Vigoureux <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready for a final working group review. > > ¤ Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent > version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than > *21st of July*. > Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed Standard RFC. > > ¤ *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of > draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document or its earlier versions. > > Thank you, > Martin > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution/ > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
