Hello Martin,
I support the draft as co-author. I am not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks,
Martin
On 07/10/2017 02:58 PM, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
WG,
We are half-way through the WG Last Call and I am very surprised to only
see a single answer to it.
I am not sure I'll move this forward with only silence as support.
-m
Le 29/06/2017 à 15:28, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 [1] which is considered mature
and ready for a final working group review.
¤ Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
*21st of July*.
Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is
also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed
Standard RFC.
¤ *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
applies to draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution, to ensure that IPR has
been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879,
3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of
draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 please respond to this email
and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document
or its earlier versions.
Thank you,
Martin
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution/
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
