Hi Benoit,
I took the editor role from Stefano.
Please see inline:
On 13/12/17 12:50 , Benoit Claise wrote:
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some redundancy in the intro first two paragraphs.:
This document reviews various use cases for the protection of
services in a SPRING network. The terminology used hereafter is in
line with [RFC5286] and [RFC5714].
This document reviews various use cases for the protection of
services in a SPRING network.
removed the above duplicated sentence.
I will post the new revision once we close on all open items from you
and other reviewers.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
