> On Dec 14, 2017, at 3:56 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > thanks for your comments. I started to agree text changes with my co-editor. > Takeshi and you commented on the same sentence, which can't be parsed. > > Your comment: -10 --5th paragraph: I can't parse the last sentence. > Takeshi's comment: 3. This sentence "As it is necessary to know that the > information is > stale is order to follow the instruction, as is the case with for > example convergence events that may be ongoing at the time of > diagnostic measurement." is not easy to understand for me. I see some > typo > in this sentence as well. > > This text proposal has been agreed between Carlos and me: > > OLD: As it is necessary to know that the information is > stale is order to follow the instruction, as is the case with for > example convergence events that may be ongoing at the time of > diagnostic measurement. > > NEW: To carry out a desired measurement properly, the PMS must be aware of > and respect the actual route changes, convergence events, as well as the > assignment of Segment IDs relevant for measurements. At a minimum, the PMS > must be able to listen to IGP topology changes, or pull routing and segment > information from routers signaling topology changes.
Hi, That’s much easier to understand, thanks! Ben. […]
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
