Adam - Thanx for the quick response.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Roach [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:40 PM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment- > routing-13: (with COMMENT) > > On 12/20/17 17:14, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > Adam - > > > > Thanx for the review. > > V14 has been published and it attempts to address the Security concerns > raised by you and others. > > Look forward to your feedback. > > Thanks! The one thing that I'd suggest for improvement is in section 8.2: > > > Problems which may arise when the above behaviors are not done > > include: > > The issue isn't isolated to just the behaviors, but also to failures of the > assumed trust model. I might suggest something more like: > > > Problems which may arise when the above behaviors are not > implemented > > or when the assumed trust model is violated (e.g., through a security > > breach) include: > [Les:] Looks good to me. Will incorporate into the next revision - which will occur after the New Year. Les > /a _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
