Tina, I am adding Pablo. He will respond to below comment.
Cheers, Gaurav > On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Tina Tsou <tinats...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Gaurav, > > Please scroll down to see the reply in line. > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.i...@gmail.com > <mailto:gdawra.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Thanks Beniot for the comments. > > Please see inline [Gaurav] > > > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com > > <mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html> > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/ > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > OPS DIR review from Tina: > > > > I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an > > informational document. > > > > Some nits: > > > > 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277) > > > > Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session > > > > should be > > > > Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session > [Gaurav] Will address in next revision. > > > > 7. Addressing the open problems > > > > the same could be re-used in context of > > other domains as well > > > > A period is missing in the end. > > > [Gaurav] ACK. > > > Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components? > [Gaurav] Yes in this context. > > > > Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it > > would > > be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking > > intra-domain > > topology and policy. > > > > Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in > > FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP <https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP> ? > > [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature? > I meant the technology described by this document. > > At FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT TOI meeting now, see segment routing is on the > list, but cannot find more detail whether msdc is included. > > Cheers, > > Gaurav > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spring mailing list > > spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring> > > -- > Thank you, Tina
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
