Hi Adrian, Please see my comments inline with [Xiaohu]------------------------------------------------------------------Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>2018年3月22日(星期四) 22:32Ruediger.Geib <[email protected]>; spring <[email protected]>Re: [spring] What is "TE" and the rechartering discussion Hey Ruediger,
Our agreement may be so complete that we may get mistaken for each other in the corridor. Using a different name for different things is wise. Of course, using a different name for the same thing is not so clever :-) So digging a little to make sure we know what each group is talking about will still be helpful. [Xiaohu] I couldn't agree more. However, I still see that some people are happy to write drafts by using different name for the same thing which has been described in the existing drafts many years before: One example is Section 6 of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrel-mpls-sfc vs https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining-03 (note that this draft has been merged into https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-clad-spring-sr-service-chaining-00). Best regards,Xiaohu Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 22 March 2018 13:36 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: AW: [spring] What is "TE" and the rechartering discussion > > Hi Adrian, > > that's a fair proposal, I think. In addition, it may help to avoid the term "Traffic > Engineering" when rechartering Spring. Spring needs to recharter now. I didn't > see any emails on the list which advised against Spring policy routing and the > related OAM mechanisms as future work items. > > Regards, > > Ruediger > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: spring [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Adrian Farrel > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. März 2018 14:08 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [spring] What is "TE" and the rechartering discussion > > There *might* be some disconnect between: > - What TEAS means by "TE" > - What TEAS is perceived to mean by "TE" > - What Spring means by "TE" > - What Spring is perceived to mean by "TE" > > An option (although it would slow the discussion a bit - it might speed it in the > long term) would be to try to clarify these points with a draft or a joint discussion > session. > Of course, that MUST NOT delay or derail the development of protocol > specifications, but I think the discussion about where work should be done is a > distraction: until that decision has been made (by the chairs and ADs) we should > write drafts and we should discuss them on any and all mailing lists where people > lurk who could help us get the work right. > > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
