I just reviewed the latest version, it seems the content of section 6 is almost the same as version-04.
This overlaps with draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining, IMHO. It seems a little bit early to adopt this version before the conflictions addressed. BR, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: mpls [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 3:56 PM To: [email protected] Cc: draft-farrel-mpls-sfc <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc Working Group, The MPLS working group have decided to adopt draft-farrel-mpls-sfc-05 as an MPLS working group document. Can the authors please post draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-00, without any other than administrative (filename, version and dates) changes. /Loa for the MPLS wg chairs -- Loa Andersson email: [email protected] Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
