To be completely clear, the two drafts I was referring to in my email below are draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining-01 and draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-00.
Cheers, Andy On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]> wrote: > Zafar, et al, > > Perhaps the fairest to all concerned is for the MPLS WG to adopt both > drafts, and then it will be up to the WG (rather than the authors) to best > determine the technical details going forward, and how best to document > them. That way the work becomes the consensus product of the WG. > > Cheers, > Andy > > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Stewart, WG Chairs and the WG, >> >> >> >> I do not agree with Stewart’s points and will response in a separate >> email. But all that is just noise and that cannot resolve the issue at >> hand. >> >> >> >> A countless time, Xiaohu has raised the issue that the intellectual >> property for the contents in section 6 of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc belongs to >> draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining. Please see one of Xiaohu's recent emails >> with the subject *"[spring] For the fairness and justice of the IETF >> culture"* dated Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 12:34 AM, copied in the >> following. >> >> >> >> This issue was also raised by many during the WG adoption poll of the >> document. The chairs adopted the work with the promise of fixing the issue. >> Specifically, in the email to announce the adoption of the ID to the WG, >> the chair(s) mentioned the following: >> >> >> >> "That decision is taken, the issues that has been pointed out are >> >> noted. These issues need to be resolved on the mailing list and >> >> rough consensus need to be reached for text changes in the document. >> >> Actually the members of the working group have much more influence on >> >> a working group document, than on an individual draft. >> >> It would be far better if we now focused on proposing text changes, >> >> rather than discussing processes." >> >> >> >> This is a serious issue; we need to remove section 6 from draft- >> farrel-mpls-sfc to move forward. These contents will proceed in draft-xu*, >> where the contents started initially. Everyone will have a fair chance to >> contribute to the contents as part of collaborations on draft-xu*. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Regards … Zafar >> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
