Hi Rob, The authors of the draft are coordinating to address your comments and will update the chairs and the WG, accordingly.
Thanks Regards … Zafar From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Rob Shakir <[email protected]> Date: Monday, May 7, 2018 at 3:06 PM To: Paul Mattes <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption of draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy? Folks, We've had this question a few times on the list. As Bruno wrote here<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/current/msg03540.html>, we're moving towards WG adoption - based on discussions with Martin, and other WGs. In parallel, we're working with the IESG to update the charter. I'll repeat myself: I don't consider WG adoption blocking for discussions and clarifications in this document. I have a number of suggestions for this (see here<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/current/msg03541.html>), it'd be great to see discussion on the mailing list of this (I haven't seen a response to this from the authors, or editors). Based on our discussions with other WGs, there are some further suggestions that will be sent as part of the WG adoption call.. If there's a specific reason that we need to do this immediately - please do share it. I've had private discussions with the editors, and did not yet understand why this WG adoption call is blocking this work. Thank you, r. On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:58 AM Paul Mattes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello SPRING WG chairs – Would this be a good time to consider WG adoption of draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy? It is part of the WG charter and is likely mature enough at this point. pdm
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
