As a co-author, I support WG adoption
Cheers,
Clarence
On 16/05/2018 17:20, Rob Shakir wrote:
Hi SPRING WG,
This email initiates a two week call for working group adoption
for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy. Please indicate your
support, or otherwise, for adopting this draft as a working group item
by *30th May 2018*. We are particularly interested in hearing from
working group members that are not co-authors of this draft.
As part of the discussions of adopting this draft into SPRING with the
ADs and chairs of other WGs, there are a number of requests to the authors.
1. Please clarify in the text traffic steering with "SR policy" and its
relationship to other traffic engineering functions. It seems to me that
this work is generally describing how one selects and steers traffic
into policies, rather than path calculation. Additional clarification of
whether this is the case (or not), would be welcome to ensure that the
relationship with other work is clear. We would ask the authors to
consider whether sections 14.1-14.4 are required scope of this document.
2.. Consider what the core content of this document is, and how it can
be make as concise and clear as possible. There are some specific
suggestions that can be made here, but we would like to see this
discussed with the working group.
Additionally, there are currently 17 authors listed on this document.
Please trim this to <= 5 front-page authors, utilising a "Contributors"
section if required for the others.. An approach to achieving this would
be to list ~2 editors as the front-page authors.
In parallel to this adoption call, I will send an IPR call for this
document. We will need all 17 authors to confirm their IPR position on
this document.
Thanks,
Bruno & Rob.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
