Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- As a non-specialist I found the organization of 3.2, 3.2.1, and 3.2.2 a little hard to follow, as it seemed to me like the SRMS section should have been introduced first before the discussion of the SR to LDP flow and behavior. Section 7 says: "The security associated with these advertisement is part of the security applied to routing protocols such as IS-IS [RFC5304] and OSPF [RFC5709] which both make use of cryptographic authentication mechanisms." Unless the use of the cited cryptographic authentication mechanisms is required when using these label advertisements, I would suggest saying "which both optionally make use of." Otherwise this seems a little misleading. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
