Just to confirm, the entire set of behaviors in section 5 are configured 
behaviors triggered by configured local policy?  They are wats to apply segment 
routing, but are not themselves. represented or advertised as SIDs?
If that is what you are trying to get at with the text there, please rewrite 
it.  Maybe describe the whole,section as an I for national use case?
Maybe also state explicitly that all SIDs are END SIDs.
The notation you have chosen makes them look like a SID type.
Yours,Joel
Yours,Koel


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" 
<[email protected]> Date: 7/17/18  14:55  (GMT-05:00) To: "Joel M. Halpern" 
<[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: [spring] Transit SIDs 
Joel,

There is no such thing as a Transit SID.

The functions that can be associated with a SID are described in section 4. All 
these functions are Endpoints functions, whose processing is only triggered by 
having the destination S registered as a local SID at node N.

Section 5 describes the transit behaviours. These behaviours -which are not 
segments-, are behaviours on transit routers that neither inspect the SRH nor 
process it.  Section 5.1 references RFC8200 on the fact that transit routers 
MUST NOT inspect or process the SRH.

Sections 5.2-5.7 define the transit behaviours that allow steering any incoming 
traffic into an SR policy. As an example, section 5.4 defines T.Encaps, which 
states a transit router can steer incoming traffic into an SR policy. As a 
result, the incoming packet is encapsulated into a new IPv6 header an SRH 
containing the SIDs of the SR policy. (further details in 5.4).

This behavior is triggered based on a local policy -i.e. it is not an SR SID 
what triggers T.Encaps-.

In your example of section 5.2, this is exactly the same. The T.Insert behavior 
is triggered based on a local policy. B2 is not an SRv6 SID.

Thanks,
Pablo.

On 17/07/2018, 08:00, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:

    I have read the text you quote.
    That text, which should as you say cause no SR processing in node N, is 
    the exact text which introduces %.1 and 5.2.  5.2 for example is all 
    about node N inserting a new SRH based
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to