Hi Uma,
On 17/07/18 09:43 , Uma Chunduri wrote:
Hi Peter,
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 9:34 AM
To: Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Concerns with draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing
> flex-algo is NOT a per path state. It's a regular prefix-SID, which
is bound to a prefix only.
Not quite. I will come back to this bit later.
please do so, as I don't know what do you mean by "Not quite".
>The problem with your proposal is that you flood all paths to all
routers in the area and ask every router to evaluate all of them and see which of
them may apply. This scale poorly.
Please see Section 6, in 01 version.
the section 6 points to a solution that does not exist as of yet. I can
only comment once it is available, but the fact that you need an extra
hooks to address the scalability just confirms the limited scaling
property of the basic proposal.
thanks,
Peter
--
Uma C.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
