Hi Adrian, 

On 10/13/18, 1:11 PM, "spring on behalf of Adrian Farrel" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    Nothing much happening with this draft.
    
    The new revision fixes a reference.
    
    We think our work here is done although it is disappointing that a couple 
of (informative) references have expired:
    - I-D.sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid
    - I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe

I just reviewed a new version of the latter draft (as a contributor) and it 
will be refreshed shortly. The refresh was delayed to address all of Sue Hares' 
shepherd review comments. 

Thanks,
Acee

    
    We would still welcome comments.
    
    Thanks,
    Adrian
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
    > Sent: 13 October 2018 18:04
    > To: Adrian Farrel; John Drake
    > Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect-
    > 05.txt
    > 
    > 
    > A new version of I-D, draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect-05.txt
    > has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
    > IETF repository.
    > 
    > Name:             draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect
    > Revision: 05
    > Title:            Interconnection of Segment Routing Domains - Problem
    > Statement and Solution Landscape
    > Document date:    2018-10-13
    > Group:            Individual Submission
    > Pages:            35
    > URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-
    > interconnect-05.txt
    > Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-
    > interconnect/
    > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-
    > interconnect-05
    > Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-
    > interconnect
    > Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-
    > interconnect-05
    > 
    > Abstract:
    >    Segment Routing (SR) is a forwarding paradigm for use in MPLS and
    >    IPv6 networks.  It is intended to be deployed in discrete domains
    >    that may be data centers, access networks, or other networks that are
    >    under the control of a single operator and that can easily be
    >    upgraded to support this new technology.
    > 
    >    Traffic originating in one SR domain often terminates in another SR
    >    domain, but must transit a backbone network that provides
    >    interconnection between those domains.
    > 
    >    This document describes a mechanism for providing connectivity
    >    between SR domains to enable end-to-end or domain-to-domain traffic
    >    engineering.
    > 
    >    The approach described allows connectivity between SR domains,
    >    utilizes traffic engineering mechanisms (RSVP-TE or Segment Routing)
    >    across the backbone network, makes heavy use of pre-existing
    >    technologies, and requires the specification of very few additional
    >    mechanisms.
    > 
    >    This document provides some background and a problem statement,
    >    explains the solution mechanism, gives references to other documents
    >    that define protocol mechanisms, and provides examples.  It does not
    >    define any new protocol mechanisms.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
submission
    > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    > 
    > The IETF Secretariat
    
    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
    

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to