Hi Ketan, Thanks for your reply.
Sure, I will go through them. Meanwhile, let us wait if someone can answer to my questions. thanks, __kals__ On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:10 AM Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kaliyaperumal, > > > > May I suggest some pointers to resources which would help you? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/documents/ > > > > More specifically, pertaining to your questions below: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8402/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8403/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8426/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dukes-spring-mtu-overhead-analysis/ > > > > There are several others in an around the areas of your questions. > > > > For Interop, I would suggest looking up EANTC reports of their tests. > > > > Besides this, if you were to search the web, you would find other > resources that gives you further information that are design and deployment > specific. > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan > > > > *From:* spring <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *tech_kals Kals > *Sent:* 08 March 2019 10:33 > *To:* Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy) <[email protected]>; tech_kals Kals < > [email protected]>; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) <[email protected]>; > ask-segment-routing(mailer list) <[email protected]>; Stefano > Previdi (sprevidi) <[email protected]>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [spring] Questions on Segment Routing > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > Thank you so much for your response. > > > > Am looking answer for other questions as well. Can someone please reply if > you can. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Regards, > > Kaliyaperumal K > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:03 AM Alexander Vainshtein < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Kals, > > Some short answers reflecting my personal understandings > > 1. LSP Ping and Traceroute work just fine with SR-MPLS. Therefore > on-demand OAM is not a problem. > > 2. There are several options for proactive OAM in SR-MPLS, including usage > of Path Segments. > > 3. Prefix SIDs are NOT a replacement for BGP/MPLS IP VPNs. > > Thumb typed by Sasha Vainshtein > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* spring <[email protected]> on behalf of tech_kals Kals < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 6, 2019 5:56:35 AM > *To:* [email protected]; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi); > [email protected]; Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy); Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); > Peter Psenak (ppsenak); [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* [spring] Questions on Segment Routing > > > > Hi Experts, > > > > I have few questions on Segment Routing. Can you please clarify my doubts. > > > > 1) How OAM can be done in segment-routed networks ? > > I think, MPLS OAM is not possible with SR as network infrastructure > doesn't have any LSP state. > > With SDN controller in place, do we really need traditional OAM ? > > SDN controller can do OAM, but at what cost (like BGP-LS) ? > > > > 2) How will the traffic handoff happen from aggregate network to core > network ? > > core is running RSVP-TE, so IP handoff can be done on edge router ? > > I don't think, SDN controller can control RSVP enabled routers. > So, how it is to make end-to-end TE i..e from Aggregate router to Core > Router ? > > > > 3) can prefix sid be used to replace VRF in L3VPN scenario? (or any other > way in SR can avoid vrf ?) > > Assume, on a router there are two interfaces. one is 10.1.1.0 VRF-1, > another one is VRF2-10.1.1.0. > > Which SID should I use to differentiate them? Can I use, prefix SID > in this case ? > > Is the below will work ? > > Eth1 - VRF-1: 10.1.1.0 == Prefix SID: 1000 > > Eth2 - VRF-2: 10.1.1.0 == Prefix SID: 2000 > > > > 4) How to handle multicast/broadcast using SR ? > > > > 5) SRv6 stacking ipv6 SRH might hit MTU limit somewhere in the network. > > Is my understanding correct ? > > > > 6) Does VRRP work with SR ? how fault would be propagated in a necklace > topology? > > > > 7) Is there any known issues related to interop with different vendors ? > > > > 8) While programming Node-SID on MPLS ILM table, can I assume node-SID > would always be programmed with SWAP operation except on PHP node? > > > > Thanks, > > __kals__ > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains > information which is > CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have > received this > transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then > delete the original > and all copies thereof. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
