Hi Ron, Very Interesting idea that you presented during SPRING session today. Seems useful.
Two comments/clarification - 1. One of the slides indicated that small packet size on the Internet was ~500B and calculated ~10% due to Routing EH overhead accordingly. Of course, if we look at mid packet size (800-1000B) or large packet size (1000~1400B), then the overhead would be a lot less. We should also look at the % mix of small packets vs mid vs large size to calculate the impact. If mid to large packets were dominant (say, as much as >70% given >80% of traffic is video (ABR etc) per the latest VNI studies ), then the overhead impact due to non-compressed SID usage on the traffic would be even less over all. 2. Also, what % of savings do we get by using compressed RH vs non-compressed RH ? 24B vs 64B per packet !! Cheers, Rajiv _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
