I am in agreement with the RFC SR requirements for no next header.
Gyan S. Mishra IT Network Engineering & Technology Consultant Routing & Switching / Service Provider MPLS & IPv6 Expert www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT Mobile – 202-734-1000 Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 15, 2019, at 4:09 AM, Xiejingrong <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello authors, > > Section 4.3.1.2. Upper-layer Header or No Next Header of > <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-18> doesn’t include the No Next > Header case ? > > The SRv6-Network-programming relies heavily on the No-next-header in > SRv6-L2VPN cases. > > Thanks > Jingrong > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
