Joel, Imagine I get IPv4 /28 block or IPv6 /64 block of address space.
Isn't it my own business how I map and to what I map my non globally routable last bits of such address ? Does anyone care - specifically would IETF have right to care - if one /32 or /128 address is used in my house to turn on the AC or coffee machine and some other to turn it off ? Those would be my embedded functions in IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. Of course there is tons of other ways to achieve such functions but those are just examples for illustration purposes. Cheers, R. On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:14 PM Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually Robert, a number of people have suggested on the 6man lsit that > the overloading of IPv6 addresses to also represent functions to be > performed is a problem. And have put proposals on the table to get out > of the problem rather than just pretending is a good idea. > > Yours, > Joel
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
