Hi Chairs, I am late to this by a few days, but for what it's worth - I support the adoption.
- Section 3, some more text on handling for cache should be added (ageing, handling for cache-miss etc). In case this is all implementation internal details, we could spell that out! Nits - Expand NSH in Title - Expand SFF,SFP on first use - RFC 2119 boilerplate is missing - Formatting in Section 6 is off, line crossing 80 characters. Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:44 AM Rob Shakir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi SPRING WG, > > This email initiates a two week working group adoption call for > draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr. This follows the discussion that we had in the > last few IETF meetings, and particularly the focused discussion we had at > IETF 104 regarding service chaining and SPRING. > > Please indicate your support, comments, or objections for adopting this draft > by Wednesday July 10th, 2019.. We are particularly interested in hearing from > WG members who are not authors of this draft, and those folks that are > willing to spend time working on this draft after adoption. > > We are also looking for volunteers who can provide a technical review of the > content of the draft at a later stage of its progress through the working > group (e.g., before WGLC). > > In parallel - we'll send an IPR poll to the working group and authors. The > currently disclosed IPR can be found in the datatracker. > > Thanks! > Rob & Bruno. > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
