Pablo, > On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:49 AM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > Let's indeed simplify the discussion and use a prefix assigned to the > provider. > We will submit a rev1 accordingly on Monday.
I think that would be better. Thanks, Bob > > Thanks, > Pablo > > -----Original Message----- > From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Bob Hinden > <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 05:01 > To: SPRING WG <[email protected]> > Cc: IPv6 List <[email protected]>, Bob Hinden <[email protected]> > Subject: [spring] Comments on < > draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-00> > > The first sentence in the first paragraph is fine, as it is proposing > using prefixes assigned to the provider. >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
