Hello, I have gone though this draft and below are my thought with respect to CRH comparison given in the draft
1. At ingress node has to more work by gathering individual micro sid . for example Node A configured with micro sid FC00::A000/32 Node B with FC00::B0000/32. Now at ingress node has to concinnated these 2 micro sid into one FC00::A000:B000: followed by of carrier which is 0000 . So this is more complex stuff introduced at ingress while programing path. 1. Even shifting of bit are hardware friendly , it is still more work then normal CRH processing where additional CPU cycle to form new Destination by playing with bits and from new destination header. Regards Parag Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
