Ron,
I don't understand why changing the filename should be an issue, isn't
it the title of the document that needs to be changed?
And the approximately 100 time the term "SRv6+" is used in the document.
/Loa
On 18/11/2019 12:05, Ron Bonica wrote:
Darren,
No problem. We will change the filename next time we update the document.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddu...@cisco.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 8:36 PM
To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; draft-bonica-spring-srv6-p...@ietf.org
Subject: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus: Renaming
Hi Ron and SRm6 authors.
The use of the name “SRv6+” is still causing confusion amongst the community,
and even during presentations by the authors of this series of drafts (eg
NANOG).
It needs to be changed in the doc names and removed from further presentations.
This was promised in this thread.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/DNfkjnGMHbmJx2dL8KY_pseFyzM__;!8WoA6RjC81c!TO6Y432l65MppFAzk6ouvlJPd2AC_TMHeOXuTOvwpoCfdOuSDYGLoyVLj0Bii58r$
Thanks for closing this.
Darren
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
Loa Andersson email: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
