Hi Ron, to follow up on what was said at the mic.

The current community analysis, comparing existing solutions (SRv6 and SR-MPLS 
for IPv6) with SRm6, had the following result:
- a lot of differences (Architecture, Dataplane, Controlplane) and hence 
engineering cost
- scale, performance and complexity drawbacks
- no genuine advantage

Hence, the very first thing you need to do is to clearly compare your solution 
with respect to SRv6 and SR-MPLS and demonstrate why the above analysis is 
incorrect.

Only with such a logical analysis, will the community be able to judge whether 
this proposal should be pursued within SPRING.

Thanks
   Darren
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to