>>> I would say that it seems we have not been following the processes that >>> should be followed. This has happened repeatedly over time, for this >>> very same topic. The process seems to be biased, and thus unfair to the >>> rest of the wg participants. >> >> Which process are you talking about? Is that documented in an RFC? > > Yes: RFC2026 and RFC2418.
More specifically? And if you feel you need to the conflict resolution and appeals process is described in rfc2026, section 6.5. >> You seem to take it on yourself to represent the "rest of the wg >> participants", but from my perspective it looks like a few very loud voices. > > I don't. Again: unless folks get consensus to update RFC8200, thy should > comply with it. The onus is on them, not on us asking folks to comply > with existing standards. Yes, we have heard your position on this now. There is of course a lot more nuance to this argument. Best regards, Ole _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
