Brian, Draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming does NOT have any text that proposes SRH insertion. The text you are pointing in Section 8.2 uses the word "Insert" in a different context that has nothing to do with SRH insertion. I have replaced the word insert throughout the entire draft to avoid this kind of confusions (rev06).
Thank you, Pablo. -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 20:37 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>, draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion <[email protected]>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function > Situation has changed since this email: the network programming draft has now removed text related to SRH insertion. > Please comment on the text if you see text related to SRH insertion. For example: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-05#section-8.2 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
