Robert,
I just realized that you are a contributor. So, I will take that as an
invitation to contribute my two cents.
Please stand by. It will take an hour or two to craft a well-considered
response and it may not be ready before I shut down for the holiday.
Happy New Year,
Ron
From: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 8:41 AM
To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>
Cc: SPRING WG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative
advantages of SRv6
Ron,
I beg your pardon, but what are you trying to say?
Isn't this a WG document now and *any* WG member is fully entitled to comment
on any question asked or point being raised ? Leave alone formal document
contributor.
Are you saying that answers from those listed on top of the draft carries more
weight ? Is this some new IETF process you are trying to define here ?
Once document transitions to WG doc status authors who own src are becoming
just editors with the obligation to incorporate WG suggested changes which got
approved via rough consensus as judged by chairs. Are you questioning that too ?
Thx,
R.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:19 PM Ron Bonica
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Robert,
We should probably let the authors decide if that is part of the answer to my
question.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
