> In the process all the comments have been resolved Unfortunately, this is not true.
For example, the word "pop" is used but still not defined. In computer science, it generally refers to popping a stack. I understand that in the MPLS context (a label stack) but not in the IPv6 context, where there is no stack in the header. The text explaining penultimate segment pop, quite apart from using "pop" in this undefined way, still does not explain how it is compatible with the RFC8200 interdiction of inserting or removing headers en route. It explicitly describes removing a header before the final routing hop, which is explicitly against RFC8200. As far as I'm concerned, these comments have been brushed aside. The fact that there's running code is good, but it doesn't resolve anything in the text. Regards Brian Carpenter _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
