On 29/2/20 07:45, Robert Raszuk wrote: [...]
And to be very clear - I am not saying you are wrong. Perhaps you look at train analogy - sure if each passenger would start messing with train car/wagons construction the train would clearly not go far. But if so we just need a new train architecture rather then saying - oh no Mr. SR you can not travel at all.
A number of us have been talling you, for a long time now, that these proposals (PSP, TI-LFA) change the architecture.
Rather than admitting they do require a change in the architecture, you have tried to pretend they fit in the current architecture.
Rather than focusing your energy in making your case for changing it, all these discussions have been wasting everyone's time trying to make each of us believe that these behaviors are currently supported by IPv6.
Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
