Hi WG, Trust everyone is doing well.
Authors have updated the SR PM draft for TWAMP (RFC 5357) and moved the STAMP (now RFC 8762) extensions into a separate draft, as the SR PM extensions are for two different RFCs and protocols. This was also a feedback from the WG. Name: draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm Title: Performance Measurement Using TWAMP Light for Segment Routing Networks URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-08.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-08 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-08 Name: draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm Title: Performance Measurement Using STAMP for Segment Routing Networks URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm Many thanks for your feedback on this work. Welcome your additional review comments and suggestions. Thanks, Rakesh (for authors)
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring