Ack, thanks Ron for clarifying!

Cheers,
Melchior

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:55 PM Ron Bonica <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Melchior,
>
>
>
> These words are intentionally lower-case and do not carry RFC 2119 or 8174
> weight.
>
>
>
> In fact, you won’t see any RFC 2119 language, IANA requests or packet
> formats in the entire document. So, it could be INFORMATIONAL just as well
> as it could be STANDARDS TRACK.
>
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Melchior Aelmans <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 12, 2020 3:59 AM
> *To:* Ron Bonica <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01.txt
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> Hi Ron, authors,
>
>
>
> Are the "should" and "must" used in the following sentence meant as those
> described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiIoJGAK3$>
> ?
>
>
>
>    To minimize packet length, network operators should use 16-bit SIDs
>
>    whenever possible.  However, when more than 65,520 SIDs are required,
>
>    network operators must use 32-bit SIDs.
>
>
>
> In other words the  Requirements Language section is missing.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Melchior
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:06 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Please review and comment.
>
>                          Ron
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 10:18 AM
> > To: Luay Jalil <[email protected]>; Gang Chen
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > <[email protected]>; Jen Linkova <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]
> > <[email protected]>; Daniam Henriques
> > <[email protected]>; Ron Bonica
> > <[email protected]>; Yuji Kamite <[email protected]>; Joel Halpern
> > <[email protected]>; Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]>
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-
> > 01.txt
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF
> > repository.
> >
> > Name:           draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six
> > Revision:       01
> > Title:          Segment Routing Mapped To IPv6 (SRm6)
> > Document date:  2020-04-10
> > Group:          Individual Submission
> > Pages:          18
> > URL:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/internet-
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/internet->
> > drafts/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-
> > gk!ReC5D9PqJg9VvhTCWgZN97t18LSeFN2lqDJE-
> > 4sfI8tHuQzazw38mDU55l4XfCX4$
> > Status:
> >  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiGjXv_EV$>
> > Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiFLvKMZ3$>
> > Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiKF1Mz-Y$>
> > Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiLfD7Vb9$>
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    This document describes Segment Routing Mapped to IPv6 (SRm6).  SRm6
> >    is a Segment Routing (SR) solution that supports a wide variety of
> >    use-cases while complying with IPv6 specifications.  SRm6 is
> >    optimized for ASIC-based routers that operate at high data rates.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/tools.ietf.org__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiMG33FtH$>
> .
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rgx7CYdsiICBAUWuI6Dy3xSPEH0YemhahBTgQ6NeA8DKEFRymprNFwmDiBIJiR8N$>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to