On 22-May-20 05:26, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) wrote:
...> It is the 6man charter that precludes it from defining a new Source
Routing solution..
> “It is not chartered to develop major changes or additions to the IPv6
> specifications.”
If this addition was major, that would be true. But adding a new RH type is
well within the scope of maintenance, IMHO. We have already done it quite
recently.
In any case, legalistic arguments about WG charters are really not how we
should take technical decisions.
Regards
Brian
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
