Hi Ron,

If using DOH, then we would have DOH (VPN) + DOH (SFC) + RH per packet in some 
circumstances, right? What if more (ever-emerging) services are required? Not 
sure about the forwarding efficiency.

Best regards,
Shuping


From: ipv6 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:17 PM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) <[email protected]>; 6man <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Cheng,

The sole purpose of a Routing header is to steer a packet along a specified 
path to its destination. It shouldn't attempt to do any more than that.

The CRH does not attempt to deliver service function information to service 
function instances. However, it is compatible with:

-        The Network Service Header (NSH)
-        The Destination Options header that precedes the Routing header

Both of these can be used to deliver service function information to service 
function instances.

                                                                                
                                     Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Chengli (Cheng Li) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 2:56 AM
To: 6man <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Ron Bonica 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

When reading the CRH draft, I have a question about how CRH support SFC?

For example, we have a SID List [S1, S2, S3, S4, S5], and S3 is a SFC related 
SID, how to indicate that? By PSSI? [1]

But how to know which segment endpoint node/egress node should process this 
PSSI? At the beginning of the SRm6 design, this is described in [2]. But you 
deleted the containers [2].

Without that, I don't really understand how SFC can be supported.


Best,
Cheng



[1]. 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01#section-4.1<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01*section-4.1__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UD4vf0darQ9cskFhH1fJ9jwZJ-nIciQxgVnf1219YuyyaNcgvNdRUdkjwP15i-Xa$>
[2]. 
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-6man-seg-end-opt-04..txt<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-6man-seg-end-opt-04.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UD4vf0darQ9cskFhH1fJ9jwZJ-nIciQxgVnf1219YuyyaNcgvNdRUdkjwNmXwyHT$>.


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to