Ketan,
Please consider an operator who:
- Wants a way to steer IPv6 packets through a specified path that includes many
nodes (>8)
- Does not want any of the following:
- A new VPN encapsulation technique
- A new service function chaining technique
- Network programming
- MPLS and uSID
- To encoding instructions in IPv6 addresses.
These operators want a compact routing header, nothing more.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:42 AM
To: Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; 6man <6...@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
[SNIP]
I am looking for explanation of the "other ways" that CRH can be used (i.e.
those outside the Spring architecture). I am trying to understand from the
authors what would be the applicability of that solution, it's use-cases and
it's requirements. That is what, I believe, will help us evaluate the CRH
proposal in the context of this working call. That will help us answer these
questions like the scope of the SID, 32-bit or 16-bit or something else and
what the CRH-FIB is going to turn out like.
[SNIP]
------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
