On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 22:04 Robert Raszuk, <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: > All, > > It looks to me that "IPv6+" is just a marketing name to sell a bunch of > new IPv6 based services and has nothing to do with SPRING nor for that > matter with IETF. >
The name implies it is a major development effort to extend IPv6, and that implies IETF affiliation. Heard about SPRING++ project yet? Think about what you would assume and how you might act regarding your SPRING deployment plans if you'd just heard about it now. > As such unless anyone has copyrights on that specific ASCII string any > vendor can use it as it seems fit their marketing strategy. > > Likewise others could still use other similar technology marketing or > product names "IPv6^6", "IPv6NG", "IPv6@5G" etc ... > Of those, only 'IPv6@5G' doesn't imply extending IPv6. > Cheers, > R. > > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:40 PM Mark Smith <markzzzsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts? >> >> >> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhen...@huawei.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my >>> clarification. >>> >>> >>> >>> a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has >>> being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The >>> development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development >>> and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and >>> providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can >>> provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud. >>> SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of >>> IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the >>> times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed. It means the >>> solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud. >>> >>> >>> b. IPv6+ has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions >>> proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization >>> work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T. >>> >>> >>> >>> I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing >>> list of SPRING WG. More questions and comments can be sent to >>> ipv6p...@outlook.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Robin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *发件人:* spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston [ >>> andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com] >>> *发送时间:* 2020年7月4日 1:31 >>> *收件人:* spring@ietf.org >>> *主题:* [spring] IPv6+?? >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> >>> I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Now, I wish to clarify a few things. >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact >>> IPv6 – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this >>> working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea? >>> >>> [Robin >>> >>> 1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was >>> presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual >>> relation between this and that crowd? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spring mailing list >>> spring@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
