Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ questions ]] [ section 8.3 ] * On the bottom of page 18 there's a definition of an IS-IS system-id. draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg has a definition of a system-id as well as an extended-system-id. Should this document reference that document's {extended-,}system-id definitions? I just wonder if this other document is somehow "more authoritative" for this type of thing, and therefore wondering whether referencing it would be the right thing to do. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
