Hi,
I am not aware of any IPRs related to this document.
Regards,
Takuya
On 2021/02/12 2:06, James Guichard wrote:
Dear WG:
This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C9be5d4dab908405837f408d8ceadef29%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637486593751248808%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AMf3lLJFjUUxSJLfQLS2HWZyD8KitGvrFm7n9CpY80Y%3D&reserved=0>.
Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough
support was received to adopt this document into the WG. However,
while the document is informational in nature, it does have a
normative dependency on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C9be5d4dab908405837f408d8ceadef29%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637486593751248808%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=tco%2FwwumvVZ%2FbtvVutDh8Dzl3PseJM9X2Q%2FUhXvfR8Q%3D&reserved=0>
which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document
will be able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more
work is necessary in terms of definition and interoperability of
resource-aware SIDs. In addition several comments were received during
the adoption call that will need to be addressed as the document
progresses through the WG process. Further, the chairs would like to
make it clear that adopting an informational document that proposes a
particular solution which utilizes resource-aware SIDs does **not**
preclude future adoption of other documents which propose a different
solution if the trade-offs are significantly different.
Authors, please resubmit the document as
draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00 and also provide explicit
confirmation as to whether you are aware of any IPR related to this
document.
Regards,
Jim, Joel & Bruno
*From:* James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
*To:* spring@ietf.org
*Cc:* spring-cha...@ietf.org
*Subject:* WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Dear WG:
This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4aefbabc297942dc563408d8c2b93697%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637473448047191786%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CW%2BREIvAYGW5RqEptdCZk4Q%2Ba1%2F4ta1XOa%2FzwEQjq1I%3D&reserved=0>
ending February 10^th 2021.
After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG
adoption to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the
document, please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an
indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing
to work on this document. Please also provide comments/reasons for
your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate
your (non) support as this is not a vote.
Thanks!
Jim, Bruno & Joel
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
