Hi Rishabh, Thanks for your comments.
It is good point, and DT will consider the it in. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng 发件人: spring [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Rishabh Parekh 发送时间: 2021年2月27日 01:50 收件人: Weiqiang Cheng 抄送: [email protected]; SPRING WG List 主题: Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team Weiqiang, Text quoted below from the SPRING charter indirectly covers Point-to-Multipoint requirement which is addressed by SR Replication Segment draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/ New types of segments mapping to forwarding behaviour (e.g., local ingress replication, local forwarding resources, a pre-existing replication structure) if needed for new usages. For the Point-to-Multipoint compression requirement, what exactly is "multicast address" in the Metric? Is this an IPv6 multicast address? If so, it really does not conform to SRv6 data plane. I would rather consider the SRv6 Replication SID, described in the latest version of SR Replication segment draft, to be the Metric for measuring P2MP requirement. Maybe we should also consider adding it to SRv6 Functionality Section 4.2.1 of the compression requirements draft. -Rishabh On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:25 AM Weiqiang Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: Hi All, Two drafts have been submitted. Please review them and any comments are welcomed. Compression requirement draft -04 version provided two more requirements: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-04.txt Compression analysis draft -00 provided a skeleton for the analysis of 4 candidate proposals. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-00.txt B.R. Weiqiang _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
