Dear WG:

A quick note from the chairs for clarity with regards to 
draft-srcomdt-spring-compression and as a matter of process for future 
unrelated documents.

With regard to section 5.2 of draft-srcomdt-spring-compression-requirements-05, 
the chairs note that this is primarily an IETF process issue, not a technical 
issue about solutions.  The chairs also remind people of two aspects of IETF 
process:


  1.  First, an IETF draft which modifies an existing PS or BCP requirement 
will not be adopted by the SPRING WG without a corresponding document that 
explicitly modifies or updates the requirement being sent for consideration by 
the relevant WG.
  2.  Second, the document which makes such a modification or update will need 
to be approved by the IETF working group which owns the existing requirement 
before the SPRING document will be advanced out of the SPRING WG.

Thanks!

Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to