Hi Greg, Thank you for your comments. Agree, we will change the document status and start a new email thread. BTW, this was a suggestion from the WG on this as part of the adoption call. Thanks, Rakesh
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:46 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear WG Chairs, Martin, and All, > as I recall it, the document that was called for the adoption was on the > Informational track. I was quite surprised that the authors switched that > to the Standards track in -07. But that is not what the WG discussed, and, > in my opinion, that may be a violation of the IETF process. We had an > earlier discussion with the authors and, as it appeared, have reached the > agreement that the work will be on the Informational or Experimental track. > The authors decided to break that agreement. Hence, I ask the WG Chairs not > to adopt this draft as a Standard track document. > > Regards, > Greg Mirsky > Sr. Standardization Expert > 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D > Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division > E: [email protected] > www.zte.com.cn > ------------------Original Mail------------------ > Sender: JamesGuichard > To: [email protected]; > CC: [email protected]; > Date: 2021/07/06 08:08 > Subject: [spring] WG adoption call completion for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm/ > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > Dear WG: > This email ends the WG adoption call for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm/. Thank > you for your feedback and comments. > Having reviewed the mailing list responses, the chairs believe that there > is enough support for adoption of this document into the WG. Therefore > authors please resubmit the document as draft-spring-stamp-srpm-00. > Note: there were several comments received during the adoption call that > appear to have been addressed by the authors in v07 (just posted). However, > if any comments/concerns are still outstanding then we expect to see those > resolved as part of the WG process and ask that the authors of this > document please work with the people that commented to resolve any open > issues. > Finally, authors please indicate on the mailing list whether you are aware > of any undisclosed IPR relevant to this document. > Thanks! > Jim, Joel & Bruno_______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
