I support adoption. T
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 10, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Ron Bonica > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Bruno, > > When a WG adopts a design team draft, I assume that the draft becomes subject > to the following guidelines from RFC7221: > > “Once a working group adopts a draft, the document is owned by the working > group and can be changed however the working group decides, within the bounds > of IETF process and the working group charter. Absent explicit agreement, > adopting a document does not automatically mean that the working group has > agreed to all of its content. So a working group (or its charter) might > explicitly dictate the basis for retaining, removing, or modifying some or > all of a draft's content, technical details, or the like. However, in the > absence of such constraints, it is worth having the adoption process include > a sub-process of gathering working group concerns about the existing draft > and flagging them explicitly.” > > Do I have that right? > > If so, I support adoption of this draft. > > Ron > > > Juniper Business Use Only > From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call - > draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - > draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > Dear WG, > > > The Design Team has produced two documents: > - A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement > - A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis > > Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are > still individual documents. > We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those two > documents. > Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not > necessarily mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the > benefit of long term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to > finalize those two documents. > > > This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September 20th 2021, > for: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis > > > After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG > adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list. > Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as > this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote. > > If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this explicitly. > This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the > working group willing to work on the document. > > Thanks! > > Jim, Bruno & Joel > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
