Hey Joel, Stuff happens (TM)
This is OK with me. It is clearly in scope and something that the WG should be looking at. This draft is a good enough starting point. Let's move on to work on it. Cheers, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern Sent: 28 September 2021 13:08 To: [email protected] Subject: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection Oops. The chairs declared adoption of what is now published as <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection > without a proper adoption call. We suspect that adoption is okay with the WG, but we need to make sure. Does anyone object to the adoption of this document by the WG? If there is significant objection we will determine what steps to take. Remember that wanting changes in the document does not require revoking the adoption if you feel the basic approach is what the WG wants to use as a basis for work on this topic going forward. Also, would the authors please confirm to the list that all relevant known IPR has been disclosed. Please respond if you are an author or have concerns. Thank you, Joel, Bruno, and Jim _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
