Hi,
> On this basis, I'm objecting to the adoption of
> draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression as a WG draft, and
> respectfully suggest that the spring wg does not adopt any draft in future
> which allows for different C-SID lengths but doesn't encode C-SIDs as
> {length,value} tuples.I support this argument, so +1 to the objection. Cheers, Sander _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
