Hi folks, revision 15 has: <quote> The color is an unsigned *__non-zero__* 32-bit numerical </quote>
This seems like a backwards incompatible change since all this while 0 was a valid color. Has this been discussed on the list? Also, are we going to make changes to draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy to define the handling for NLRIs that have color set to 0? Thanks, Nandan On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:11 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of > the IETF. > > Title : Segment Routing Policy Architecture > Authors : Clarence Filsfils > Ketan Talaulikar > Daniel Voyer > Alex Bogdanov > Paul Mattes > Filename : draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-15.txt > Pages : 39 > Date : 2022-01-26 > > Abstract: > Segment Routing (SR) allows a headend node to steer a packet flow > along any path. Intermediate per-path states are eliminated thanks > to source routing. The headend node steers a flow into an SR Policy. > The packets steered into an SR Policy carry an ordered list of > segments associated with that SR Policy. This document details the > concepts of SR Policy and steering into an SR Policy. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-15 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-15 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
